Flat earth theory and tropical zodiac?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffliCP2dU0
It may sound completely stupid but has anyone verified this theory? Until now all the video I saw on this subject seemed completely insane but that video above seems quite convincing to me. I didn’t verify anything yet as I just saw it yesterday.
I’m not very good at astronomy but the testimonies seems to match reality. Their main argument is that there is no proof of the earth curvature, that we can see at the horizon at distance that we aren’t supposed to see if the earth had a curvature. That almost all pictures from Nasa of the earth globe are either CGI or made from a fish lens. That the moon landing is fake, this one I’m quite sure it’s true because I have seen a lot of well made documentary on that, the Nasa picture or video are indeed fakes, there is a very well known professional photographer that made a documentary on this , and their excuse for having lost their technology to land on the Moon doesn’t make any sense.
On the astrology side, tropical astrology and vedic astrology seems to have technique made for a flat earth, the south indian chart and the north indian chart could be made for a flat earth.
In the 2nd documentary they claim evidence that during an eclipse the moon wasn’t visible, that the Sun got eclipse probably due the Rahu point, which wouldn’t be a point then, but the so called “Black Sun”.
My main question is on the astronomy side, what would it change from the software if the Sun would be much closer than we think? That the Moon also?
Santos Bonacci seems to have use Flat earth for a long while, but it seems he is still using the same calculation for the planets position. Also it seems most navigation system, either Naval or aircraft seems to use a flat non rotating earth as a model to fly or navigate according to the documentary. So maybe it doesn't change much for the astrology calculation also.
Also they think the center of the earth would be the north pole called Mont Meru, and from a flat earth point of view the center of earth would make more sense.
Here is the link to the 2nd documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OfbwhU5PQk&t=56s
Its mathematically not possible for the earth to be flat. Anyone who has ever set up a telescope will know this. WHen we set a telescope up we look at our lattitude on earth where the telescope is being set up. Based on that we point the telescope at a particular angle and it points right to the pole star. If we move north or south, we adjust the tilt based on that math and it sill points to the pole star. This would not be possible if the earth was flat.
Hi, I'm new here, but delighted to have found your post.
I came to the so-called flat earth theory in 2020, during the plague. Immediately after being disillusioned with germ theory (prior to which I was an inveterate germophobe) I was confronted with the bizarre notion, and resisted it, convinced that it was a conspiracy to detract from the historic scandal of a medical edifice in need of replacement.
After countless videos from various authors, some of whom were publishing on the topic since 2016, a time when I was well asleep to cosmology as a controversy... I eventually found one whose spiritual bent went beyond the logical arguments (which by that time were already satisfied) and this allowed me to finally accept the truth. [1]
[1] The seas are level and the earth does not constantly move... the heavens are another matter (if matter at all!)
I recalled this book recently, wishing I still had my copy (Vedic Universe: Flat Earth by Radha Charan). It uses advanced scriptural references, making it a difficult read, not unlike The Book of Enoch, which it also references.