Leaning age vs dysl...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Leaning age vs dyslexia

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Likes
810 Views
Lorris
Posts: 82
Topic starter
(@lorris)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

I have been researching dyslexia and I realized something that might be true. This is coming from my previous post on yahoo where I said that one type of dyslexia seems to be linked with Sagittarius. So my theory was that dyslexia might be due to having too much Sagittarius or fire sign but mainly Sagittarius, other fire sign too but less often or  it's another kind of dyslexia. This would be causing them to not learn from others because they aren't socially oriented, they learn by themselves (fire oriented behavior).

This morning I was thinking that dyslexia might not be seen as bad as it is by our society if we weren't in this learning age of Aquarius. Which is a social oriented sign. Let's say we would be in a fire oriented age, then we wouldn't have as much information available like internet or books, then learning by yourself would be more useful, figure out things instead of always relying on google. In that king of age, dyslexia would be an inability to learn things without outside help. If there weren't this vast amount of knowledge available we would be forced to discover things by our own ability. So the Fire oriented people would have the edge. 

There is also another thing that I realized from this, Ernst said that Jupiter in Aquarius seems to be make people rich, and that Aquarius may be linked to some kind of  ability to make money or wealth. What if that is true or more apparent because we are in this Aquarius Age, if we weren't in that age maybe it would be less likely to be true. (I'm assuming we are in this Aquarius Age)

Share: