Will you please explain the difference between Aryama and Vidhata in terms of wealth distribution?
Vidhata is the one who decides what wealth goes where. For this reason in the struggle to survive, some people, some cultures, have had more resources. ITs a way to explain this inequity.
Aryama gives a person wealth because its needed to be a companion to their companion. Bringing nothing to the table, and next year doing the same, and nextyear the same, .... does not create a foundation for long term companionship. so a person's resources and resourcefulness reflect the needs of the companionships they share. Half of an aryama person's wealth is there due to thier companionship needs.
And then we have Bhaga, which gives to the one that deserves it the most, right? Merit based distribution, correct?
Staffan