It might be a stupid beginner question, but I can't understand this idea of Laggitadi Vastas and Deepdadi Vastas. Like, when we use Laggitadi Vastas, we use it in conjunction with Jagrati Vastas. So, let's take Mercury and Venus, for example, since they're also always so close to the Sun. In Laggitadi Vastas, if Sun is conjunct Mercury and Venus, he's gonna agitate them. But, if he is in lower dignities, then it won't have the strength to agitate and hurt those planets. It can only hurt them when it's in Moolatrikona exaltation or good higher dignities. But, in Deepdadi Vastas, it is the opposite. A good Sun exalted in own house won't hurt, but a bad Sun debilitated or enemy-signed will hurt Mercury-Venus verse in Deepdadi Vastas rules. Like, I know that we can use this rule in the context of which Avashta we are using, Like, we can look at it from different rules, but it's still the same chart. So, how do I know if this Sun is hurting these planets or helping these planets and in what context? Because, we can use the different rules, but it's still the same thing that I'm looking at, right? I'm a bit confused between these two how do we know which one to use where and what results will be more concrete or is this contradictory?
From what I understand about these in a Sun Venus conjunction: in Taurus sun dasa will suck for a bhava in Taurus due to its deeptaadi avastha in Taurus. but Venus dasa won’t be bad for that bhava because Sun is sleeping and so can’t stop Venus from being productive with its own rasi even though the laajitaadi avastha is starved and agitated.
My question is that Venus is still kopi in deeptaadi. So won’t the bhavas in Libra fare better than the ones in Taurus that Venus conjunct?