hi ernst, and all,
when viewing rahu and ketu position in a chart we look at their position from the lagna, as well as in a woman chart from the moon and in a male chart from the sun.
1.which is more prominently dominant as a placement in a person reality , the rahu and ketu from the lagna or sun/moon.
2.also what if the position from the sun/moon is opposite to the position of rahu and ketu from the lagna. for example in a woman chart, ketu in the 4th from the lagna however from the moon rahu is in the 4th?
another question
if rahu/ketu in a sign but more close (in few degrees difference) to the cup in the next sign do we analyze the position of rahu as influencing the cusp in the next sign which it close to, and the sign which it is in separately?. so lets say ketu in leo, the 3rd cusp in leo but the 4th cusp in virgo closer to ketu (with a difference of 3 degrees of influence closer to ketu in leo), do we analyze ketu as influencing leo as a sign and 4th cusp separately or do we look at ketu as influencing the 4 cusp and virgo as they are connected in the expression of the 4th house in virgo ?
@ernst thank you would you please also elaborate on my second question?
if rahu/ketu in a sign but more close (in few degrees difference) to the cup in the next sign do we analyze the position of rahu as influencing the cusp in the next sign which it close to, and the sign which it is in separately?. so lets say ketu in leo, the 3rd cusp in leo but the 4th cusp in virgo closer to ketu (with a difference of 3 degrees of influence, meaning ketu closer to the 4th cusp in virgo while being in leo), do we analyze ketu as influencing leo as a sign and 4th cusp separately or do we look at ketu as influencing the 4 cusp and virgo as they are connected in the expression of the 4th house in virgo ?
yes, you can do that but the cusp in the sign the node is in will be more significant. You can analyze all cusps in context of rahu and ketu as I did for the angles and for 4/8/12, you can do for all opposite cusps as well. there are two halves of the chart, what cusps are closest to which node impacts all the houses.
@ernst so basically what you are saying is that the cusp in the sign rahu/ketu in, is the most dominant and secondary the cusps that are closes to rahu and ketu would be influenced in a way that the closer the cusp is, the most influence it would have on the cusp?
if there is no cusp in the sign rahu and ketu in do we look at the closest cusp to be the dominant area rahu / ketu will influence but as a secondary thing?