Hi @ernst and everyone
Wanted to bounce this thought that's been going through my mind since a couple of days. It seems that when we think about a planet and its Lajjitaadi avasthas in the context of PAC, the avasthas that planet is causing to other planets is less important than its own avasthas. So for example, while thinking about Jupiter, Jupiter being starved by Mercury is more important than Jupiter delighting Sun. However, this doesn't seem to be the case for the Moon. While thinking about avasthas of the Moon, it seems Moon delighting Jupiter is more or less as important as Moon being starved by Saturn. If that's correct, then is this because of Moon being a receptive planet, it's delight or starvation to other planets affect the Moon(child mind) itself, whereas in the case of Jupiter delighting Sun, its not going to affect Jupiter itself?
THey are all equally important. The afflictor and the afflicted are both playing a game together that does not work.
I signal out the moon in this because the moon is rarely starved, so with moon, its not like looking at saturn where he is most commonly starved, its looking at who the moon is starving.