Just working my way through this Vic Dicara playlist all about tropical/sidereal.
(99) The Tropical Zodiac in Vedic Astrology, with Vic DiCara - YouTube
Does anyone know any good tropical astrologers that still do readings? It seems that most of the big ones don't really give readings any more. Seems a shame.
This matter of sidereal vs tropical astrology is very very tricky for a few reasons:
1. When we deal with subjective matters we are not dealing with truth 99% of the time. What I mean by this is that people are so full of ideas of who they are, who they should be, whats important to them, and its all BS. Much of it is not who they are AT ALL. Over a lifetime if we look at their lives and we look at how they think of themselves and how they potray themselves, these are very different pictures. So when a person looks at a zodiac and says its more like me, is it the REAL me, or the me that they created an image of, a mask, that actually does not hold up in life. One of the most amazing things to me about my journey in astrology has been to watch this happen in my life. To see something in my chart and think, YES, that's ME. And then to to through years of transformative experiences and see, wow, I didn't read that right (whether through wrong zodiac or simply wrong application of a technique ), that wasn't me, I am actually this. Now at 51 I look at my laugh and I just laugh. I laugh at what I though I was at 19, as I find out what indeed I am was something that I never thought of growing up to be. See, the thing we are, we don't think about that, its the things we are not that we think about all the time! ANd then we look for the chart to explain to us what we are not but what we think we are and then sidereal dont work, tropical dont work, nothing works GOOD enough. So, the truth of a zodiac emerges to ones view only as the truth of ourselves emerges, otherwise there is just confusion. And even when others look at us subjectively, its all based on our mask, our portrayal of what we are not. How bad is this portrayal? THe disruption of energy that occurs when we portray instead of life as we really are is the most responsible part of disease, and how many sickness do we have in the world. That will give you a picture of this. NO WONDER we can't make up our minds about the zodiac! The people who are most adamantly attached to the wrong zodiac, they are the ones who are the most lost with respect to themselves and that is why they have to PUSH their zodiac onto others because its an act of personal validation of who they are not and so it comes with frustration.
2. When we deal with the concrete, birth time is EVERYTHING. 4 seconds changes the results of your life with respect to concrete events. When predictions are made, they are using astrology that is not scientific enough to be accurate without intuition. Look at the hands of the predictive astrologers that have the most fun with it and who are the best of it, they have intuitive fingers, not intellectual fingers. Its up to us with the intellectual fingers to improve the techniques of astrology cause to the intuitive astrologer they think the techniques they use actually work. One famous predictive astrologer owns me 5,000 because they had a technique they swore was 90% accurate and they asked us to program it for them. We did, it never worked. It gave 50% results on a simple question with 2 options. There was no technique there, but they were predicting these things regularly in their practice. They said, its not working, and since i can't sell the report, I can't pay you.
The last 4 years I have been working on a predictive technique that pulls all of Parashara principles into one package of high accuracy. Its very exciting, uses ALL the vargas for EVERY prediction because I have seen so often with my twins born a minute apart how different the events of their lives are and its only explained by looking at ALL vargas for EVERY prediction. It sounds overwhelming, I know, but its not, ITS SO SIMPLE. Its the most simple clear method I have worked on. However, I have some road blocks that are making the techique give good results but not perfect results as of now: One is the birth time, the other is the Vimshottari Dasa as there are several factors that change vimshottari dasa: 4 options for year lengths, three options for nakshatra calculation, and 2 options for vimshottari, so that's 24 permutations, and that's for each ayanamsa and there are more ayanamsas than there are good predictive astrologers, haha. Every important event one of my twins has that the other does not, which means EVERY event cause they never have events of importance that are the same or on the same day, helps me get a little closer to overcoming the hurdles.
3. When we deal with the concrete, the techniques are in such bad shape that its so hard to make a prediction that its very difficult to test with concrete as well. So, how can we test our calculations when our techniques need work and how can we improve our techniques when the calculations are not trustworthy? That's what you call a bad relationship. Like when you are in love and one person needs something from you and you can't give it because they are not giving you something you need and they cant give it because you can't give them what they need. The nonworking-relationship circle. A catch 22. The only cure, is comiting and and taking the time needed for the insights to come that allow the problem to be solved.
4. And finally, the final reason that we struggle with determining the correct zodiac is that maybe neither sidereal or tropical is correct, at least in their presentation. That's a harsh statement, but its one that every researcher has to consider. Lets think about this, there is no mention of a useable zodiac of Aries, taurus, etc. in Indian literature written in the BC ages. Jaimini is 300-600 years before that and it mentions rasis and when he calls the rasis as aries, he says, if I say aries, ignore it, I dont mean aries, I mean a number that is the rasi from 1-12. Why does he put aries, taurus, etc. down like that? What does he have against aries, taurus, etc? So while jaimini does mention aries, etc. he does not do so as USABLE names.
There is a 12 fold division of the ecliptic that is tropical mentioned in the rig veda, but no names attached to the divisions. The earliest names of the 12 divisions are the Adityas. These are twelve solar gods that rule the solar months of the year. Aditi is their mother. Aditi is the infinite, the boundless, the undivided. The Adityas are what is there when we break Aditi up, so I see Aditi as the ecliptic of which the Adityas, her children, are the solar months. The 12 adityas have a lot of symbolism attached to them. They each have beings who accompany them during their monthly sojourn each year. These beings are a rishi, a snake, a Rakshasa, a gandharva, etc. which provide the symbolism for the month. The first aditya rules the first month of spring, which is from about feb 21-march 21, with the second month of spring being march 21 to april 21. I am in the process of digging up information all all these beings that accompany the adityas in order to flesh out the symbolism of of this rasi symbolism which is the oldest found in India, long before the names of Aries, taurus, etc. existed in India. its a tropical division, no chance of it having to do with sidereal, and there may be a lot of symbolism in these Adityas that without, the tropical zodiac is being misrepresented and thus not to everyone's satisfaction.
This is not a time in astrology for those who seek instant gratification in perfection - to much work needs to be done. Its a time for researchers who enjoy the challenge - those will be the happy astrologers. And those intuitives, they are always happy astrologers. I really hate how easy it is for them to be happy with astrology! BV raman used to say, if you want to make good predictions with astrology, MEDITATE. Its true, with all the issues we have to sort out with astrology, developing your intuition is the fastest way to predict well. Learning the best techniques available, that will help point your intuition closer to the mark, but until we can predict two twin's different lives accurately in a mechanical fashion without intuition, we still have work to do on our techniques.
The other things to remember is that there is NOTHING on this earth that is about perfection. NOTHING. Its all about getting to the next step. That's ALL. So if astrology with this or that zodiac, this or that technique, helps you get to the next step, then it served its purpose. Its all about taking the next step. We need to gain the insights we need for that next step. However we get it, it does not matter. For some reason, all of us, are here because we can get that next step with astrology. There may be a time when we won't get the next step from astrology and then we need to leave astrology and do whatever it is that is going to get us to the next step.
Yes, I have thought a lot about the nadis and how they give sidereal positions. I wish its something I could investigate more and actually read the leaves and have them dated. Are they translating them into the modern convention in india and do they even have rasis in them? who knows. But it should be investigated. I had a friend who went to nadis all over india. Very famous ones, unknown ones. He really was into seeing what they could do. He would take a 2 day train trip to visit one and then turn right around. The consistent thing with all his nadi readings was that they gave amazing details about his life upto the present, amazing details about his parents and family, but that most of the predictions for the future did not happen. So the past was accurate, the future accuracy was really poor. That makes me wonder, are many of these nadi's just working as psychics? Cause that is what I regularly experience with psychics, very accurate about past, but lost about the future.
There is something called the Jyotish Nadis. That is when the light opens up energetically in a person and they can do readings without astrology. Its still considered jyotish as its based on energy which is light and jyotish means light. So I wonder if these nadi readers are reading as Jyotish Nadis.
I have a couple questions about Tropical though.
When I use my Sidereal software with Lahiri, will the Vimshotarri dashas still be correct as we use Sidereal for nakshatras? Will the nakshatras still be correct? Or will they be wrong. I notice on vault of the heavens, the nakshatras/dashas are quite different.
But then if talking about the rashis, I use tropical?
Or where can I learn about this? I am starting the Parivartan course now.